Have a Concern about a Farmworker Camp? Let FAN know by filling out a brief survey.

Share a Confidential Concern

concerns about housing, wage violations, health and safety, or other

Report Enforcement Issues

problems related to your experience filing a complaint or reporting a concern

Report Access Issues

Violations of farmworkers’ right to receive visitors

Entries by Daryn Lane (3)

Monday
Jul232012

The Affordable Care Act's Prognosis for Farmworkers

Cross-posted with the North Carolina Council of Churches

Every day, about 243 agricultural workers suffer injuries that cost them work time; about five percent of these injuries result in permanent impairment. Agriculture consistently ranks among the three most hazardous industries in the United States. In 2008, the National Safety Council ranked it as the most dangerous industry, and the U.S. Department of Labor reports that children performing farm work are four times more likely to be killed than those employed in all other industries combined.

Nationally, migrant health clinics serve only about 13% of the intended population, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Of the more than 150,000 farmworkers in North Carolina, less than 20% receive health care. At the same time, the fatality rate for farmworkers statewide is higher than the national average, and nearly 10 times higher than the average state fatality rate for all other occupations.

It is appalling that many of those who harvest our food and contribute to our well-being often work at such personal risk without basic health care. One step in the right direction was the recent announcement of $128.6 million in awards through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) which will add about 5,640 doctor, nurse, dental provider and support staff jobs nationally to clinics serving farmworkers and others. The money will go to 219 health centers nationwide, increasing access to more than one million additional patients.

The Supreme Court ruling that upheld the mandate contained within the ACA helped to ensure the continuation of these programs that allocate money to public health care centers. While this decision will benefit many, including some farmworkers, many more will be left behind. According to a detailed analysis by Farmworker Justice, undocumented farmworkers, who make up a majority of the U.S. farmworker population, will only marginally benefit from health reform and will continue to encounter enormous barriers to health care.

Eighty-five percent of farmworkers in the U.S. have no health insurance, and 9 out of 10 children in farmworker families are uninsured. The majority of these workers do not qualify for social services because of their immigration status, even though many live significantly below the federal poverty line.

Because  farmworkers are often impoverished, uninsured, live in isolated areas and move frequently to follow work, many face financial and logistical barriers to receiving health care, says the Texas-based National Center for Farmworker Health. In addition, few health delivery sites have adequate Spanish language resources, including those in North Carolina, where 94% of farmworkers are Spanish-speaking.

Meanwhile, unresolved health problems can limit farmworkers’ ability to maintain productive employment, further perpetuating their position in a vicious cycle. Farmworkers are not protected by sick leave and risk losing their jobs if they miss work. Industry exemptions from rules that protect workers in other sectors and poor enforcement of existing rules leave farmworkers vulnerable and without legal recourse.

Harsh working and living conditions put farmworkers at a high risk for injuries and illness, including work-related lung diseases, noise-induced hearing loss, skin diseases, chemical-related illnesses (such as neurological disorders, miscarriages and birth defects), and certain cancers associated with chemical use and prolonged sun exposure.

Many workers also don’t seek preventative care from physicians for fear of being reported to ICE and consequently being deported. Those who are undocumented often avoid going to locations or institutions where they are made to present identification or where a record of the visit can be documented, which prevents many individuals from seeking proper medical care. Bruce Gould, MD for the University of Connecticut’s mobile Migrant Farm Worker clinic says that sometimes during his visits to camps he finds farmworkers hiding in bushes — they are often desperate for medical care but fear they will be fired if their foreman finds out they are sick.

The American Farm Bureau estimates that without the help of undocumented workers, the agricultural sector of the economy would lose between $5 and $9 billion in flowers, fruits, and vegetables and would cause more than 20% of the production to move overseas. Agriculture is North Carolina’s leading industry, constituting 22% of the state’s income. Eighty-five percent of fruits and vegetables produced in the United States, including those in North Carolina, are harvested by hand.

The help provided by migrant farmworkers is critical for the agriculture sector of the U.S. economy. As Guillermo Noguera, Health Outreach Coordinator in Columbus County, NC said, “Farmworkers feed the world. I think if everybody knows the importance of farmworkers, they will want to keep them healthy.”

All people deserve care. Providing health care to all is not an issue concerning only the patient that is ill; rather, it encompasses a public health dimension, which involves the health of all members of the community. As Margarita, a mother and farmworker in Oxford, NC noted “It’s very important, not just for one person but for the whole community.”

Looking beyond individual health and the economics of the law, will the Supreme Court’s decision reinforce America’s commitment to civil rights and equal opportunity for all – including farmworkers? Or will it reinforce the role of health coverage as a divider between those who will prosper and those who will not?

Daryn Lane, Student Action With Farmworkers Into The Fields Intern

Wednesday
Jun272012

For Young Farmworkers, No Time for Homework

cross-posted with the North Carolina Council of Churches

At a farmworker camp this past week, sitting on the ground with a plate of rice and tortillas in my lap, I glanced around at the faces of my dinner companions. We were about to begin our theater group’s inaugural performance as a part of Student Action With Farmworkers’ Into The Fields summer internship. During the skit I witnessed the workers’ tired faces dissolve into laughter and recognized that many of these jubilant smiles belonged to young men -- aged far beyond their years due to long days of hard work in the fields.

I was reminded of a bus ride in Guatemala, and the seat I shared with a man who told me his story: how he migrates seasonally with his father and brother to work on farms in Canada. When he asked how old I thought he was, I guessed early thirties. “Twenty-one,” he said. I was stunned. Long after I stood on the curb squinting after the brightly-painted school bus receding into the distance, I thought about the man’s lost youth--a year younger than I--and how he hadn’t had the opportunity to continue his education or pursue other goals.

President Obama’s recent memo to stop deporting young undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. before they were 16 and have graduated from high school is a stride in the right direction. But think of all the children and youth working in the fields who will never even set foot in a high school, and who therefore do not qualify for this exemption. According to data compiled by the National Farmworker Ministry, only ten percent of adult farmworkers surveyed have graduated high school and eighty percent of adult migrant farmworkers function at or below the 5th grade level.

U.S. law sets 12 as the minimum age for farm work, not 16 as is standard for all other industries. Furthermore, while children in other sectors are not permitted to work more than three hours a day during the school year, there are no limits to how many hours children can work in agriculture (NCC). A report from the Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs (AFOP) found that children work in the fields for thirty hours per week on average, often during the school year. The same federal laws that prohibit a 13-year-old from working in an air-conditioned office, still allow that same child to work in 100-degree heat in a strawberry field.

As one Guatemalan youth in Morganton, North Carolina, said, “If we don’t work, we don’t eat. That’s why we don’t go to school.” Although many obstacles lie between migrant children and formal education, the primary barrier is work--magnified by lack of job security and the fact that farmworkers receive the lowest annual family incomes of any U.S. wage and salary workers.

It’s hard for children to stay in school because their personal and familial choices are limited. When these “decisions” become a matter of survival, the short term implications -- money for their next meal -- become more urgent than the long-term consequences of dropping out of school. Even if a child is able to continue his or her schooling while working only part-time in the fields, “[One] study found that students who work more than 20 hours a week were less likely to do homework, earn A’s, or take college preparatory courses.”


Just this past April, under pressure from farm groups and agribusiness, the U.S. Department of Labor dropped proposed changes in safety regulations that would have prevented children from working in dangerous conditions on farms owned by anyone except for their parents. In response to this disappointing move by the Obama administration, Norma Flores Lopez, Director of the Children in the Fields Campaign at AFOP said:

“Farm work for many children is not a vocation. For the children of farmworkers, whose lives will continue to be put in jeopardy to harvest America’s food, this is not an educational experience to prepare them to own their own farm one day. They are left exposed and unprotected through this move to withdraw the safety rules for children employed in agriculture.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), agriculture is the most dangerous industry for young workers in the United States. For children, risk of injury and chemical poisoning is higher, because their bodies and minds are still growing.

Overall, lack of education for farmworker adults and barriers to accessing education for farmworker children leaves families with no hope for a better life. Those who work hard to feed the country deserve a dignified life, whether they want to continue working in the fields, going to school, or both.

At the farmworker camp in Benson, I wondered whether or not the gangly thirteen-year old kid with the big smile on his face attends school and what his fate will be in another year. I remembered the man’s face in Guatemala, wrinkled before his time, and felt the bus pull away like a rug pulled out from beneath our feet. I felt as though I was witnessing lost potential and trampled dreams.

--Daryn Lane, Student Action With Farmworkers Into The Fields Intern

Watch more short documentaries on child labor in our fields:
Tuesday
Jun192012

Farm Bill Amendments Would Cut SNAP; Disproportionately Affect Latino Children

cross-posted with the North Carolina Council of Churches

Last week, while senators in Washington indicated their overwhelming support for the Farm Bill through a preliminary floor vote, farmworker families throughout the Southeastern U.S. toiled long hours in the summer heat. After 14-hour days in the fields, many farmworkers return home pesticide-ridden, underpaid and empty-handed — financially unable to provide adequate food for themselves and the hungry mouths that await them.

What many don’t know about the hotly-debated “Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2012,” commonly referred to as the Farm Bill, is that more than 80% of the bill’s funding goes to nutritional programs. One such program is SNAP, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as food stamps). This bill would slash $4.5 billion in funding from SNAP over the next ten years.

SNAP has faced a bad rap in recent years, but Dottie Rosenbaum, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, thinks much of the criticism has been exaggerated: “In my view, one of the biggest myths is the claim that some people make that SNAP is growing out of control and is contributing in a substantive way to the deficit,” she says. “To the extent it is growing, it’s for reasons that we very much understand — it’s about addressing the needs of people in a bad economy.”[1]

According to the Congressional Budget Office, this cut would result in an estimated $90 less a month on average for groceries for those families who are in need of assistance.[2]

What’s not being said is how these cuts, combined with a recent amendment to the bill, would impact farmworker families in particular. The amendment, proposed by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, would require that every person in a household show proof of citizenship before anyone in the home applies for SNAP.[3]

This means that if just one member of a household does not have proper identification, no one in the family is eligible for SNAP.

Both multigenerational families living under one roof and Latinos in mixed status families–those including a parent who is undocumented or  is a legal permanent resident but not yet eligible for benefits — would suffer. This would inordinately affect Latino children who would otherwise be eligible for the program but more than half of whom have at least one immigrant parent.

During an interview with MSNBC’s Al Sharpton on Thursday evening, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) argued against Sen. Sessions’ amendment, referring to the first book of the New Testament: “In Matthew 25, the first question Christ asks on Judgement Day is, ‘Did you feed the poor?’ It’s unacceptable that we have Republican advocates who are saying it’s immoral to support food stamps.”[4]

Flashback to North Carolina: A recent article from Toxic Free NC notes that “according to recent data, nearly half of farmworker families in NC don’t have enough food to put on the table. It’s no wonder. Most farm workers are exempt from minimum wage laws, and all are exempt from overtime pay. Typical pay for harvesting sweet potatoes in NC is 40¢ per bucket, which means that a worker has to pick and haul two tons of sweet potatoes, bucket by bucket, to earn just $50.”[5]

At a time when we should be investing in nourishing our youth, Washington is threatening to strip away many children’s only means to a meal. When we should be investing in improving access to programs like SNAP, Congress is on its way to turning more kids away hungry, adding an estimated 4.5 million Latino children alone to the already 16 million children who are at risk of hunger in the U.S.

Sen. Sessions’ proposed amendment to the Farm Bill is just the latest in a string of political and economic policies that have reduced food security among farmworker families.

According to a report issued by the Food Chain Workers Alliance released the day following the Senate’s preliminary floor vote, “More than 86 percent of workers reported earning subminimum, poverty, and low wages, resulting in a sad irony: food workers face higher levels of food insecurity, or the inability to afford to eat, than the rest of the U.S. workforce.”[6]

And as César Chávez pointed out decades ago, “It is ironic that those who till the soil, cultivate and harvest the fruits, vegetables, and other foods that fill your tables with abundance have nothing left for themselves.”

Senators are expected to cast their final votes on the Farm Bill and pending amendments next week.

TAKE ACTION against the amendment which attempts to deny an estimated 4.5 million Latino children access to food stamps, follow the link below:

“16 Million Hungry Children in America is Apparently Not Enough” | NCLR

To access the new report highlighting farmworker food insecurities as a PDF, click the links below or refer to the article to request hard copies:

For articles and more information related to the Farm Bill, check out these links below:

– Daryn Lane, Student Action With Farmworkers Intern

 

[1] Neuman, Scott. “Why The Farm Bill’s Provisions Will Matter To You.” NPR. NPR, 13 June 2012. Web. 14 June 2012.

[2] Fox, Lauren. “Big Cuts to Food Stamps Loom in Farm Bill, But Gillibrand Vows Fight.” US News. U.S. News & World Report, 07 June 2012. Web. 15 June 2012. <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/06/07/big-cuts-to-food-stamps-loom-in-farm-bill-but-gillibrand-vows-fight>.

[3] Elba Arroyo, Liany. “Latino Children Shouldn’t Be A Political Piñata.” Web log post. National Council of La Raza. National Council of La Raza, 13 June 2012. Web. 14 June 2012. <http://www.nclr.org/index.php/about_us/news/blog/latino_children_shouldnt_be_a_political_pinata/>.

[4] Reilly, Mollie. “The Huffington Post.” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 14 June 2012. Web. 15 June 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/14/kirsten-gillibrand-jeff-sessions-food-stamps_n_1598631.html>.

[5] Duncan Pardo, Ana. “Foodies For Dignity: How You Can Honor Farmworkers This Harvest Season.” Web log post. Toxic Free NC. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 June 2012. <http://www.toxicfreenc.org/informed/winter10/foodiesfordignity.html>.

[6] The Hands That Feed Us: Challenges and Opportunities for Workers Along the Food Chain. Rep. Farmworker Advocacy Network, 8 June 2012. Web. http://www.ncfan.org/research/2012/6/8/the-hands-that-feed-us-challenges-and-opportunities-for-work.html.